Message-ID: <56132asstr$1182967801@assm.asstr-mirror.org> X-Original-To: ckought69@hotmail.com Delivered-To: ckought69@hotmail.com X-Original-Message-ID: <BAY138-W23C5B234FAFCBD2F764877BF0A0@phx.gbl> From: Carol C <cobillard@hotmail.com> Importance: Normal Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2007 13:48:57.0228 (UTC) FILETIME=[E88074C0:01C7B8C1] X-ASSTR-Original-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:48:57 -0400 Subject: {ASSM} First Communion, First Semen, and Mother's Pride Lines: 520 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:10:01 -0400 Path: assm.asstr-mirror.org!not-for-mail Approved: <assm@asstr-mirror.org> Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories.moderated,alt.sex.stories Followup-To: alt.sex.stories.d X-Archived-At: <URL:http://assm.asstr-mirror.org/Year2007/56132> X-Moderator-Contact: ASSTR ASSM moderation <story-ckought69@hotmail.com> X-Story-Submission: <ckought69@hotmail.com> X-Moderator-ID: newsman, emigabe "Feminist literature of the twentieth century has challenged the virgin/whore dichotomy of religious symbolism by analyzing the patriarchal system that gave rise to beliefs about women as the sexual property of men." (Bronwen Liechtenstein, cited below) Indeed. ---------- Nearly every boy I have told my story to has wondered whether, in the days before Viagra (taken by so many boys as a precaution on the day that they anticipate their first sex with a girl), impotence isn't often a problem. Out of apprehension, nervousness, insecurity, fear of failure -- especially while being watched by his peers. The problem arose less often that the uninitiated might suppose. Chief among the reasons is that we spent our whole childhoods in preparation for puberty and enjoying the Holy Communion of orgasm and ejaculation. Another reason is our emphasis on oral sex as foreplay. Especially if you have had the opportunity to watch others at sex you will know that a full erection, while nice -- even gorgeous -- is scarcely essential for oral sex; and in the first seconds of stimulating a penis with her mouth a girl will most often find the penis getting progressively harder. Indeed, removing it from her mouth and licking and kissing and admiring it almost always adds to its firmness. Finally, nearly all the boys who joined us, or who attended our summer camps and sex parties would have experienced a childhood of open sexuality and family nudity. Most of those involved at Mom's Friend's House were single mothers, many of them refugees from the Children of God and from other religious cults, mostly sects with sexual overtones and many with habitual sexual abuse. They were therefore especially sensitive to the needs and feelings and attitudes of their own offspring, and to their sexual readiness. It is true that the most common age for first sex for girls was 13 and for boys 13-1/2 or 14. (In fact, I was under 12 when I first became sexually active.) Impotence doesn't seem to have been a factor, even at girls' coming out parties, where the boy would be under a good deal of scrutiny by the girl's mom and a few of her friends as he deflowered her. Of course there was a whole minuet to that, and the girl would be taking his penis into her mouth first, and then he would be kissing and licking her clitoris and her vagina and by the time he inserted he penis she would be so wet and lubricated that the importance of a really stiff penis would be in case her hymen needed strong pressure to pierce it. Conceptually, a boy who is gay might be expected to demur at the final moment. But in fact gay and lesbian offspring would only rarely reach the stage of a planned public sexual event. There were many dropouts from Mom's Friend's House -- mostly not on account of sexuality or the lack of it but because Mom's Friend welcomed so many women with children for other reasons too: as a refuge from abuse for example. The only requirement was that they had to have some background in sexual liberalism and an interest in passing that liberal attitude to their children. There were two other criteria that applied to boys: they had to be, or become, circumcised and they had to be sponsored by a girl. But for a boy who was sexually and intellectually attractive to us, sponsorship was not a real barrier; the point of that requirement was just to manage the gender balance and really it was used more often as an excuse to justify an arbitrary appraisal. As always, I can offer an example. My Mom was a member of a women's discussion and self-help group at which mothers could resolve, or try to resolve, issues relating to their own or others' sexual abuse by religious workers and teachers and others in loco parentis. Through one of the women at a meeting she was introduced to one of those many mothers who, themselves very involved in sexual exchanges and family openness, had worries about her son. Apparently she had several times arranged sleepovers for him with girls and he had failed, or been unable, to consummate sex. Yet she knew he was capable of an erection because she often saw him in the mornings with an erection that he would scarcely try to hide. Inasmuch as, two years prior, I had seduced dozens of virginal boys on the houseboat, Mom proposed that he should meet me. Eventually a date was fixed for him (aged barely 14) and his nearly-13-year-old sister, herself already sexually active, to visit Mom's Friend's House. Mom supposed that in due course to two adolescents might join us regularly. The only possible impediment was the religious teachings that underpinned our sexual liberalism: the whole point of sex at the cusp of puberty is to bring an adolescent closer to Jesus -- to an understanding that the sharing of semen constitutes quite literally the sharing of the body and blood of Christ. To us, sexuality, and more especially sexual expression witnessed by family and friends, represents the highest form of religious devotion. Arousal -- and erection -- show the presence of God. Orgasm rewards us for our devotion and our sharing. Mom invited the mother to visit Mom's Friend's House to see if our beliefs and practices were consistent with hers, and whether she perceived any risk of trouble because while she and her children had embraced a culture of family nudity while the kids were small, when they approached puberty her kids resisted the practice. Mom thought that this sudden embarrassment and modesty were evidence of a failure to have taught the essence of sexual liberalism, and of sex as a religion. While it is generally difficult, even impossible, to recruit average mainstream kids into a sexually liberal way of life, the background of these kids -- having seen their mom and her boyfriends nude and aroused and having been used to going about nude (albeit in an immature condition) -- Mom thought that they might be brought around to our way of life. That they might more easily accept that having sex with multiple partners on successive days in front of friends and family serves as a sharing of love and faith and a reinforcement of commitment to Jesus. You can't be sure, really, how a stranger will view our sexual freedoms, or our parties and our coming out events. For the mother at least, the sight of teens frolicking in an uninhibited way was refreshing and she was willing to take the chance. I think that it was the aspect of feminist control over sexual relations and relationships that swayed her in the matter. As it happened, she had a glimpse of one girl's coming out: of the two mothers -- of the boy and of the girl -- presiding over the girl's first physical encounter with a penis, with oral sex, with orgasm and ejaculation: with defloration. The sight of adolescent penis sliding into adolescent vagina made wet and eager by the boy's romantic kissing and licking, the penis going in only at the point where the girl is already on the verge of orgasm, has always brought tears to mothers and friends. So Mom had the two kids and their mother meet me and a boy I selected as a date for the sister at a local restaurant, a regional fast-food chain. The idea was to make sure of our compatibility before exposing Mom's Friend's House to the scrutiny of those who might find fault with it, and bear witness to the authorities in a way that could put us in danger. The boy I brought along was -- deliberately -- chosen from what I would call the "B list". There was no point in intimidating the brother by making him compete -- to have sex in tandem with his sister -- against an athletic type, a drop-dead gorgeous boy with the best of all possible penises. The boy I chose was one of those reasonably attractive, if a bit overweight, types. With a nice, but not overly impressive, penis; a reliable erection, a fondness for oral sex and an eagerness to assure his date an orgasm. I wasn't sure how much the mother had told her kids about our way of life. I knew very well how to handle adolescent boys. If I can get a boy interested in my breasts I can eventually disarm him, explore his body and enjoy his penis. Except for trying to establish some sexual electricity between the son and me, and the daughter and my supply boy, this meeting was just talk. With my usual innocent (and yet blunt) manner, I managed to elicit the kids sexual past. That the girl had had sex a few times, with the sons of various friends and acquaintances of her mother. Her mom's strategy had been to have her to share a bed with boys as often as possible, almost from the first appearance of pubic hair and within a few months the inevitable defloration happened. Unfortunately when the same thing was tried with her son, bedding him with daughters of friends, nothing happened. Hence the mother's eagerness to try something more direct. It is open to argument whether, if her fear was that her son might not be, or grow up to be, fully heterosexual, whether any pressure put on him to have sex with a girl at age 13 or 14 would change anything. I suspect, though, that boys' having early access to vaginas does have a positive impact in two ways: it makes masturbation redundant, and it encourages a potentially bisexual boy to have sex with girls. There must be some role for conditioning in that. It is certainly my observation and experience that early and frequent spontaneous sex in tandem with friends and siblings doing likewise goes a long way to banishing false modesty, inhibitions, and adolescent neuroses. Of course that goal is best accomplished by exposing children from an early age to the sight of adolescents at sex. A girl who has always known that a penis belongs in a girl's mouth and vagina, and that a girl can delight in the taste of semen will look forward to her bodily changes and will want to start her sexual life early. And she will probably not resist her mother's advice and guidance -- the more so if she has seen her mom making love to penises and anticipating ejaculation with delight and devotion. On that basis, and following our initial meetings, the mother brought her two children to Mom's Friend's House for a pool party. I had made it clear that we were always topless at our pool, and so that, at least, was no surprise. But Mom's Friend had suggested that Rev. X be there too. Rev X, as readers of these essays will know, was behind much of Mom's Friend's theology of sex. He had a convincing manner, and there were few females older than 18 who had not played with his penis one or more times. I have written how, on my 18th birthday, he managed to seduce even me, although I would not, afterwards, take his penis into my mouth. It's just that you can't help feeling at the particular moment that his erect penis is offered to you -- with all those soft and holy words -- represents some Divine urge and that its ejaculation will give you an immediate blessing of specially holy semen. They arrived at the pool and met Rev. X and right away fell under his spell. I don't know what the mother had told them, or really very much about the role of sex in their growing up. But it was obvious that the mother had instantly adopted our guiding principle that parents have a responsibility to observe their adolescent children's early sexual experiences and to provide guidance and protection from coercion and abuse, and assurance of pleasure and safety. I was the first to disrobe and enter the pool. The boy and girl at first did not respond; my Mom urged them on and they seemed to have no trouble undressing to their underpants. By this time Mom, Rev. X and their mother were nude. Their other whispered something into her daughter's ear and she took off her panties, but she then couldn't escape from the urge for modesty and she covered her pubic area with her two hands. Her brother, meanwhile, stared alternately at me and at his sister. The two women and Rev. X were now in the pool and Rev. X was engaging the mother in animated conversation. I called to the boy to come in the water and he turned around, took off his underpants, and slid into the pool in such a way that his penis remained hidden. His sister, left alone on the pool deck, finally followed him into the water. The boy I had selected for her immediately joined her. We played for some time with a water polo ball, and it served to break the ice. There was a good deal of touching. I made sure to stay close to my target boy and to keep him thinking about me and, I hoped, about my vagina. Rev. X had his hands all over the kids' mother and she seemed to be enjoying it. He invited her out of the pool, and we could see his huge erection which he soon pressed against her back, holding his hands on her breasts and watching us, intermittently kissing her deeply. Then his hands were at her crotch, caressing her clitoris: she seemed to welcome his advances because she kept her legs enough apart to give him easy access. And at the same time she was, by words and gestures and attitude, encouraging her children to let themselves become aroused and excited. Her daughter and the daughter's partner were seated and chatting; the next time I looked the boy was admiring her breasts and his hand was on her leg, approaching her thigh. And there was apprehension on the girl's face. The boy had spread his legs a bit, and his penis was no longer flaccid. I could see -- I know these things -- that he wanted to attract her attention to it, and that she was trying not to notice. But aware that her mother and the rest of us wanted her to notice. About this time Rev. X started embracing and kissing the girl's mother, and the boy took that as a signal to kiss the girl; before long his hands were all over her breasts but she dared not protest. And then his hand squeezed between her thighs. And she seemed to give up the protest and any attempt to resist. He stroked her clitoris; her hand surrounded his penis. (Later on, one of the girl's friends and the friend's mother would sneer that overnight the girl had turned from being nice to being an obvious tart. But they were not only cruel but wrong: they did not know or care to know God's plan and the coincidence of the pleasure rush of orgasm with biological and theological law; nor the true meaning of puberty and its attendant human and personal rights.) Soon the boy's face was at the daughter's vagina. She looked around for guidance; we were all watching and all smiling -- except for her brother who looked embarrassed. Rev. X said something about the promise of delight and that the key to delight was mutuality and that the penis was God's instrument. I told her that what this all meant was that she should get to the point and play with her boy's penis. She said something about never having touched a penis before, that it was always the boy's job to see to things. My answer to that was simply that no girl ever got an orgasm without looking after her own interests. But that this boy was guaranteed to make her happy and that she really should start by kissing his penis. Now the boy had separated her labia and his tongue was at her vagina. But he didn't stay kneeling for long. Soon he was standing in front of her and offering his penis to her mouth and she was hypnotically entranced. Her mom and I, almost in unison, told her to open her mouth and she did. She seemed to know what to do next and I got close to her and said that she should look alternately at the penis and at her partner's face and try to match her cadence to his pleasure. After a while, with the penis moving in and out and occasionally revealing its head to us. It had taken only seconds for her to be a hesitant, regretful innocent to a girl who enjoyed and understood the power she holds over the (respectful, kind) boy whose penis is in her mouth. The boy guided her; she followed our instructions and looked alternately at penis and eyes. I told her again to watch her cadence. And Rev. X was intoning something soothing and confidence-building. At a certain point I told her to expect a rush of semen, to be careful with it, to let it sit in her mouth and not to stop stroking the penis with tongue and lips until her boy was completely finished. Despite the warning, the boy's ejaculation surprised her. I knew he tended to ejaculate a lot, and he did: semen seeped out of her mouth and she was unsure how to deal with that. I told her not to swallow it all just yet, to leave some in her mouth while the boy returned to her vagina. He worked slowly, and we could see his tongue finding its way in the tunnel and his lips kissing her clitoris. Then there was a constant stroking of that clitoris and, in due course, a shrieked acknowledgment from her. The boy's penis was fully erect and in accordance with our custom that meant it should have at least a few strokes in her vagina. We helped her to take a lovemaking position where her vagina looked its most beautiful and the gorgeous penis went inside. Now the brother was curious, and his face was up close as the penis moved in and out. But his own penis was as flaccid as ever. When the boy finished, I told the brother that it was his turn; and could see he was worried about performing. I told him not to worry. Neither the size nor the stiffness of his penis would matter: we would have fun and his mom and his sister would witness it. I had him lie back and my mouth was over his penis. I held his scrotum with one hand and the base of his penis with the other and I licked and kissed his penis, flicking my tongue on its underside. Then I began moving my head up and down, stroking his penis lightly with my lips. It helped a little; the penis was now not so soft. It measured maybe two inches around and six in length -- but those are just guesses. It looked lovely above the scrotum and the black pubic hair and told him so. But first he had to make my vagina ready, the way the boy had readied his sister's. I lay back and had the boy duplicate what had been done to his sister. Now it was his sister's turn to look from close by. My Mom said some encouraging words. I know, more or less, how to hurry my climax and it didn't take long to happen and I pulled the boy up by his shoulders, moved my legs way apart and back, and with a little help from the sister stuffed his penis into my vagina -- which was now dilated and wet enough so that despite its softness it went in easily. The boy felt the joy and satisfaction of the first time. I told him to find his own pace, and said that if he stopped and rested for a few seconds every so often his penis would get harder. That's a matter as much of psychological unblocking and dissipating anxiety as of blood flow. After a few minutes his penis did, in fact, get reasonably hard. But it took him a very long time to reach orgasm. When he did, I could tell that the weight of worry had dropped from his shoulders and his loins. His penis was out of my vagina, yet it was still stiff. I sat up ad grasped it and began to kiss and lick and suck at it to enjoy what semen was there. And Rev. X told him to do the same to me: to show his gratitude by kissing and licking my vagina again. Rev. X's point is a good one: if you can condition a 12- or 13-year-old boy to have no shame or hesitation to tasting and ingesting his own semen, then you help him to appreciate the essence of sex as a religious experience -- with semen as the medium, the host, of God's message. By now, Rev. X's penis was in the boys mother's mouth. Rev. X's big, hairy penis made a contrast to the petite, gentle woman. I couldn't tell whether oral sex was in her normal repertory or not; perhaps she had learned from what she had seen her offspring doing. But she approached the penis eagerly enough and we could see pleasure on Rev. X's face. It couldn't have been more than five minutes before he ejaculated and semen dribbled down her chin. And then he was at her vagina. But he took a soixante-neuf position above her, so his penis dangled at her face and every so often she would lick at it; and finally she took it into her mouth again. And his tongue continued to stimulate her clitoris, to explore her vagina; then he put his mouth over her entire vaginal area and we couldn't see anymore what, exactly, he was doing. Except that her pleasure, and then her climax, were obvious. I felt bad that my Mom hadn't had a partner for sex that day. When one of the college students, a former regular, wandered by the house, I asked him to make her happy. I think it made Mom feel important as well as good for a Chippendale-worthy blond boy with a lovely penis to make love to her, starting with oral sex as foreplay and then piercing her vagina so sensually and filling her with semen that would drip from her vagina for the rest of the afternoon. But the point I want to make here is that the boy's impotence was a temporary aberration, caused by apprehension of possible failure and fear of inadequacy on account of size. Those are issues I had to deal with all the time when I seduced 12- and even 11-year-old boys at the houseboat when I myself was 12 years old, but blessed with what people thought was a great figure: sturdy, good-sized breasts and pubic hair that I never shaved. For people to think, and to argue, that any guilt or shame can attack to a girl arousing a penis to stiffness and taking it into her body and consuming its semen is one of the great shames of all those false religions and hypocritical political movements throughout the ages. Indeed it is brought to parody by Muslims with their covering-up and their purdah. I look forward to a time when communal, and family, tandem sex will be unexceptional, when a father and mother can attend a daughter's defloration the way mothers have done at Mom's Friend's House. And been proud to see their daughter grown up all of a sudden, knowing a penis and feeling the blessing of semen as a First Communion. It is, in short, refreshing, lovely and religiously inspiring when one can observer in public a boy and a girl, meeting at random as members of the same closed circle of safe partners, flirting, becoming mutually aroused, embracing and taking the process to its inevitable conclusion within one's field of vision: mutual orgasm and exchange of bodily fluids, both thanks to divine presence and participation. The family side of this would come to bear in future years as this brother and sister, and a few other siblings and cousins too, would take pride in displays of tandem sex at our nude dance parties. Typically brother and sister, each with his and her own partner, would engage in mutual oral sex and try for a display of a fountain of semen streaming down a penis and sucked back into the girl's mouth. But when I was part of such an exhibit I liked just as much to have my vagina high and on display and the boy's ejaculation timed so that, at withdrawal, semen streamed at my vagina and he then re-inserted his penis to draw out the last drops. Not every boy can ejaculate that way without contemporaneous physical stimulation, but many can and I think it is an inspiration to anyone watching close up. A visualization of God's miracle. And, as I like to call it, a renewable resource if not perpetual motion. (As I've said before, one can always spot the young man or woman who's grown up in Mom's Friend's environment. Regardless of physical beauty, there is sensuousness and pride of body, pride of potential. Clothed with flirty, thoughtful smile and positive, confident attitude, or even more so seated nude with (typically) legs a bit apart the way Mom's Friend taught, so that vagina or penis are highlighted and proud. The kind of competition that makes girls catty and jealous and spiteful in so many places is neutralized by confidence born of orgasm as a right, independent of anything but romance itself, and faith.) When I was a little girl, Mom used to talk about the significance and the adult pleasure of a "stream of semen" and sometimes she would invite me to watch. It was only when I was invaded by hormones at age 11 that I really understood, however. But the preconditioning must have been a factor in finding that I liked to control it and to show it off to others and try to arouse them to a state of sexual urgency. I know that porn stars try to duplicate, or simulate, this but they rarely succeed: they are too bland. "Amateur porn" (an oxymoron if there ever was one, since noncommercial sex can hardly be "porn") is closer to the fact. It a fact that society welcomes nudity, and sometimes even sex, as art. At the extremes are paintings such as "Dejeuner sur l'Herbe" and "Equus", Tom Stoppard's play that recently ran in London (and that I saw, believe it or not, with one of my professional colleagues when we were there for a conference: http://tinyurl.com/2zo6mw ("Everybody Loves Harry Potter's Naked Penis") and "9 Songs" a film that aspires to be mainstream and which may or may not be just an excuse for public displays of streaming semen to a mainstream audience. Of course "Caligula" beat it by some decades, but that's another story. (Unfortunately -- and I add this only because somebody asked me -- we weren't seated close enough to the stage for me to see whether Daniel R. is circumcised or not.) In mainstream life, it is often supposed and often pretended that a mother takes pride in her daughter's virginity. (Bronwen Lichtenstein, "Virginity Discourse in the AIDS Era: A Case Analysis of Sexual Initiation Aftershock", NWSA Journal 12.2 (2000) 52-69. http://tinyurl.com/37zgr3 It is not only a double standard but a gross violation of female personal autonomy and rights that anyone -- preacher, politician, parent -- should pretend that a girl or woman is demeaned by a penis entering her body other than for the purpose of procreation. (I suppose you know that the anti-abortion lobby really wants to ban contraception too, and that it wants to punish women for their sexuality, just as those Texas legislators refused Texas teens access to vaccine against cervical cancer. (Similarly, nobody is stressing the importance of circumcising baby boys to help protect their future partners from cancer.) And reality is anyway often quite different. Mom is jealous: she wants to be there for the event and see the penis enter vagina. A marriage ceremony is a substitute, a proxy, for that. And quite apart from that "mystical relationship" between a mother and her son's penis that I have so often remarked on, the vicarious joy that a mother can get from seeing her daughter bring a penis to ejaculation is too obvious to deny. The story is different as to fathers, because there the embarrassment at personal arousal from a daughter's playing with a penis can disrupt the parental role. I've known many fathers who could rise above this: Terrific Girl's father, a single parent -- like many men in his position who had to minister to a daughter through her sexual development and awakening -- was happy to see his daughter nude, and happy to see her taking the initiative with a boy and having his penis in her mouth, and showing off her vagina and her orgasm, and all the rest. But in the past I've mentioned fathers who saw their daughters at sex during our nude dance parties and, at least in one case, could only be restrained by Older Girl's intervention -- quickly flirting with him and doing to his what he had seen his daughter do to some boy's penis. (The problem does not arise in a family situation, because there the father certainly is within reach of orgasm when his daughter begins her flirting. And the issue doesn't arise either with a son making love to an unrelated girl, or perhaps to a cousin. It's a father-daughter thing, the inverse or reciprocal, I guess, of that mother-son's penis relationship. I think it merits more academic study than it has had thus far.) Love, Carol Note: my Angelfire Web site has been dismantled -- not through my doing -- and I can't rebuild it because between my job, my boyfriend and my ailing Mom I no longer have the free time I once had. I am trying to recover some of the few essays that were published there but not ever submitted to ASSM, and I'll will submit them too ASSM for archiving Most of the links will not be recoverable. A listing by Google of all available essays is here: http://snipr.com/cobillardindex When I have recovered as many documents and links as I can, they will be posted here: http://snipr.com/cobillarddocs _________________________________________________________________ With Windows Live Hotmail, you can personalize your inbox with your favorite color. www.windowslive-hotmail.com/learnmore/personalize.html?locale=en- us&ocid=TXT_TAGLM_HMWL_reten_addcolor_0607 ------- ASSM Moderation System Notice-------- This post has been reformatted by the ASSM Moderation Team due to inadequate formatting. -- Pursuant to the Berne Convention, this work is copyright with all rights reserved by its author unless explicitly indicated. +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | alt.sex.stories.moderated ------ send stories to: <ckought69@hotmail.com>| | FAQ: <http://assm.asstr-mirror.org/faq.html> Moderators: <story-ckought69@hotmail.com> | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |ASSM Archive at <http://assm.asstr-mirror.org> Hosted by <http://www.asstr-mirror.org> | |Discuss this story and others in alt.sex.stories.d; look for subject {ASSD}| +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+